On the origin of Quantum Physics, dark energy, dark matter and gravity. (Unified theory of Physics)

Observe that this site is under construction!

This is the fourth time I am rewriting the title of this virtual report. Because I have a well functioning theory explaining the origin of all laws and phenomena that are known within our universe in a precise way it is very hard to find a good title that brings into attention what this unified set of equations that describe this all from within from microcosmos up to macrocosmos. My last attempt below was "On the origin of (all) the laws in physics" and before that, "Empty Space Physics" and first I thought about something like "The production of artificial gravitation through relativistic circular moving particles that are nonlinearily accelerated". The title should be of contemporary interest and correctly describe the contents, but in this case it is very vast.

1). The first title has in mind the actual core finding that I made about a theoretically way to induce gravity mechanically (relativistic) about 30 years ago and from which all my other results were revealed as easy natural consequences when examining different fictitious experimental setups.

2). The next title "Empty Space Physics" has in focus the most astonishing direct consequence of this gravity generating particle movement, namely that empty space must have a mass and be compressible and that empty space itself is a simple form of matter and also that actually all matter is made of twisted, shaped and compressed empty space that was formed by the forces originating from the "Big Bang". Hereby it can be shown many properties of the original mass of the universe before the "Big Bang".
If any particles or matter of any kind other than pure "linear empty space" exists, then several conditions must be fulfilled of the "exploding seed": 1) It is not infinitesimally small before explosion. 2) The density distribution before the explosion is not even. 3) Both the seed and the exploding parts contain rotational regions i.e. the explosion is not purely linear (rot m ≠ 0 and div m ≠ 0 of both the seed and the exploding matter) and both rot m and div m are unevenly distributed before and after.
This also applies to the total sums of rot m and div m. ∑ rot m ≠ 0 at the moment of explosion is the reason to that matter and antimatter does not occur in the same amounts naturally. (That ∑ rot m ≠ 0 can be seen by the recent mapping of the background radiation in the universe.)
If you have some compressed empty space it will be of higher density than the uncompressed and therefore also have higher force of gravity. The only stable form except a sphere is a rotating hollow pipe shaped into a hollow toroid (ring) where both the ring rotates as well as the pipe itself in a way that the centripetal forces and gravitation within the doubly circulating body is in equilibrium. I call this a basic empty space quark. It can be shown that the original simplest forms that may absorb the non linear rotational impact from the "Big Bang" are nine different types possible, that is what I call the 9 empty space quarks.

3). My next attempted title "On the origin of (all) the laws in physics" came from the very simple and beautiful way in which the origin of many physic laws can be explained simply as the result of the law of mass action in different ways.
Gravity can thereby be seen as a force were the more dense matter of two bodies try to reach equilibrium in density with the empty space in between them. Because both the bodies and the empty space are of the same material, they tend to want to dissolve into each other.
Hence the denser bodies seem to want to "eat up" the empty space in between when they all three actually only are dissolving in each other. The fictive vision of the gravity force is due to the extreme difference in concentration of matter (and its inertia). Say that water has the density of 1 kg/l and empty space a few mg/(km)3.
Inertia and the law of acceleration can be seen as the friction of matter to empty space. If you compress a room (of empty space) to eight the times its density, inertia will double for all objects within it.

4). My last title above is due to that all of what I describe in point 1) to 3) has already been known to me since 30 years but I did not want to submit the results in public, because how wonderful and satisfactory all this knowledge seems (it has made me feel endlessly fortunate and lucky for over 30 years) it did not solve the link between the laws of macrocosmos and microcosmos. It is obvious that both empty space and gravity are the same every were. Particles and larger bodies somewhat rely on the same laws of motion and inertia.

But in microcosmos you have quantum mechanics and in macrocosmos there is the problem of dark matter and dark energy. I can not say that I have come any further than Einstein did if my theory not explains these matters and how they relate to each other in detail and also to Newtonian physics.
Already in the age of enlightenment science has tried to expel superstition and witchcraft. But the last century quantum physics has made simple logic seem as to be totally wrong. Instead of light and clarity physics more and more seems to spread darkness and ambiguity.

All because of Quantum Physics. I do not mean there is anything wrong with Quantum Physics itself if you see it experimentally. But the lack of some clear explanation to why it is so and how these phenomenon relate to classic physics make the scientists who work with physics more and more resemble wizards and I wish not to be counted among them (the last). The mystics around and about Quantum physics attract many but this nor further experimental work does contribute to any explanation of the phenomena.

Therefore I decided to not go public with my discoveries (except for my master thesis) as it did not explain "all of it". I was totally satisfied knowing myself.

About 2 years ago I got a moment of enlightenment sitting on my veranda solving sudoku:
What if all this rotating and extending empty space (=matter) was naturally condensed into these 9 possible empty space quarks plus some non rotating linear empty space which is the most natural result of the explosion of a non uniform "seed".

Would not then the law of mass action tend to distribute these 9 different empty space quarks as evenly as possible? Of course is it must be so. First being like a sparse matrix like an unsolved sudoku to further on filling out space like a giant samurai sudoku in all three dimensions with a grid of about 1/10' of an electron. If one quark is forced to change its position within the grid, the law of mass action will strongly try to "solve" the unsolved sudoku again by letting other quarks jump around after specific "sudoku laws of solving".

But as long the already solved sudoku is left untouched it is very stable. One thing leading to another when you perform microcosmic experiments fictitious on this grid and you may explain the origin to most quantum physic phenomena as Pauli's exclusion principle, uncertainty laws and other.

So now I know for certain: God does not play dice! He solves Sudoku. An enormous 3d Samurai Sudoku big as the whole universe with a grid smaller than an electron!

This structure of the in our eyes empty space also easily explains the macrocosmically occurring dark matter and dark energy. Dark matter is simply the distributed weight of the empty space itself. Although it is just some mg/(km)3 its volume is massive so in total it is absolutely not negligible. Dark energy is simply the distributed double rotational energy inherent in the empty space quarks of the enormous samurai sudoku grid within all of empty space.

In total this equals to all rotational energy of the "Big Bang" seed minus that in other forms of matter than empty space.

Why do I wish to change the title so often? Simply because I want to find the best title which draws most attention before I go into the detailed synthesis and analysis of physics in an universe.

(… thank god for Bob Dylan and his Nobel price.)



On the origin of the laws in Physics

I originally intended to call the subject of this writing something like: "The true matter of Empty Space". This as the main subject at first was to explore the true properties of Empty Space by simple Newtonian and relativistic Physics and show that it both has a mass (density) and may have an internal (rotational) energy as well as it has inertia (against propulsion/acceleration) as in: F = m * a .

This theory I had already evolved fore about 30 years ago, then as a part of an examination work to my undergraduate studies.

This paper will finally contain a collection of thoughts discussing the origin of all the known laws within physics starting from very simple and fundamental principles in nature such as the law of mass action.
But first I will try to explain some general topics that have a basic impact on why and how this paper is shaped.

The title intentionally resembles that of Charles Darwin's work "On the origin of species". This as both works assume that a few very simple principles of nature as natural selection (versus the law of mass action) forced by the action of strong natural forces as the struggle for existence (versus the ongoing scattering of matter since the "Big Bang") and as this is then applied to a very vast population for a very long period of time (versus all existing matter of the universe). The resulting outcome from these simple natural forces acting over a long period of time are in both cases surprisingly diverse in such an extent that it gets hard to believe that the true origin is as simple as postulated herein.

(N.B. As I was of the age of 4 years on my way to Australia with my father on the Transatlantic freighter Wangaratta, he was teaching me the fundaments of differential calculus as we had lots of spare time out at sea. He then gave me the following guidelines to understand truth in nature: " If you have two different explanations to some natural occurring phenomena - one is very simple and easy to understand and the other is very complicated and hard to understand in every way. Truly my son you will find that in almost all cases the first straight and simple explanation will be the real and true one!")

As with most new true scientific statements they give birth to lots of more or less naturally following consequences that explain previously hard to understand phenomena.

The consequences include to bring a new light on all known phenomena in physics as also the inner structures of matter and how it has evolved from the turbulent empty space shortly after the "Big Bang". The explanations will include enlightenment of the origin of quantum physics and how it relates to macro physics in detail, as also a full explanation to the origin of dark matter and dark energy and why no antimatter naturally occurs to be present in the contemporary universe.



The kernel of this theory is a very simple device that I call "the Probe". This simply is a small particle of mass that I theoretically let repeatedly accelerate/retard in a circular closed loop orbit at relativistic speeds (partly it holds a notable fraction of the speed of light).
It is not crucial how the particle is forced to get the specified movement (mechanically, electromagnetically or else).
I just presume that it is gradually forced to predetermined specific speeds at different points along its circular orbit. I also imagine the particle somehow to be connected to the circle center with a "rod" which forces the particle to keep within its orbit. As you know any particle will move along a straight line, not along a circle if not held in some way at equidistance from the circles central axis. Again I do not need to specify how this is arranged, it may be by a physically mechanical rod, electrostatically, magnetically, by gravitation as with satellites or else. The only thing of importance is: what force does the moving particle expose on the axis for a complete circulation around the orbit. The speed settings are designed to be different combinations of linear and/or nonlinear accelerations /retardations along the path of the particle. Observe that the same movement is repeated for each cycle and speeds at some points are high enough to force the use of relativistic mechanics to get the correct result of calculus: F(θ) = m(θ) * a(θ).
.
If you put this theoretically Probe in a totally empty "Black box" (the axis connected to the box) and place it in totally empty space and calculate e.g. its behaviour if a combination of linear retardation and exponential acceleration at relativistic speeds are used, then the law of impulse conversation calculated along one whole revolution will be cracked due to the relativistic deviation of the particle mass.
Thereby the Probe (Black box) will start to accelerate (somewhat pulsating) but seen totally for many revolutions along a linear path in some direction which is depending on the specific design of the particles circular movement in its Black box. You could say, that you have produced "artificial propulsion" and as long as you let the Black box accelerate along its linear path (not hold it back by force), you will need to add the same energy that its momentum increases with if you wish to withhold the desired determined movement of the particle. Calculus can show that no energy injection is needed if the Black box is held back to be still with no movement. This is physically consistent with the laws of potential energy in physics: a 1 kg weight laying on a table here on earth needs no energy to do so and if this 1 kg weight is switched to a 1 kg heavy Black box whose inherent Probe is set to utilize a vertically upwards force of 9.81 N, the Probe will not need to consume any energy if the table under it is removed and the Black box is let to hover at a constant height.

The consequences of calculating different theoretical experimental setups built on the Probe will yield in a very waste range of new statements about the true properties of empty space (ES), as I will show later in detail. Remember the early experiments with vacuum where there was shown that even two oxen couldn't pull apart two hemispheres who were held together by the air pumped out from inside them.
At that time air was commonly almost not seen as matter at all, this because only the wind revealed its existence and before it was practically possible to measure the difference between a bottle filled with air and one without (with vacuum in it) no one could know if air really had any weight at all because of the lack of a scientifically feasible experiment.

The weight of solid mass is easy to determinate, but already if you wish to measure the weight of a liquid you need a device to hold it in, as a glass or a beaker. The next step of difficulty is reached as mentioned before when you wish to measure the weight of a certain amount of gas. Here you need at gas tight container among other. The next physical state which gives even greater resistance to be measured is the weight of empty space ES.

(N.B. I do not count plasma as a physical unexcited state of matter. Instead I here intend to follow the Biblical four states were the last and smallest "King" actually is the biggest one of them all - even much bigger than the other three put together.)

To measure the density of ES you need a Probe designed as above. Actually you need a matrix of sync Probes were the particle is being a valence electron of a polar liquid or in a semiconductor junction.

If you could in some way (examples of designs later) build a container or in some way lower the contents of empty space between, two hemispheres, as in the experiment with the oxen before, you may imagine that the forces it would take to pull these apart again will be extreme. Actually it is practically impossible if you "pump out" all of the empty space within the sphere. This is so because the definition of two points with no empty space between them is, that they both are and always will remain to be the same point!! (The first law of empty space physics!)

I have seen pictures in physics literature showing multiverses (multiple universes) pictured as a lot of circles touching each other on a paper. This is totally ridiculous if you know the fundaments of Empty Space Physics!
If there is no space between the universes they must be cubes! Because two points with no space in between is the same point! But has any astronomer ever seen any tendency that our universe is cubic? That's totally ridiculous he would say!

To come back to what sort of container you need to measure the density of empty space, we can look at the first three physical states:

1) A solid contains itself.
2) A liquid in gravity (as on earth) needs a beaker.
3) A gas needs a totally enclosing container.
4) Last it is known to us that no ordinary container will hold back empty space (ES).

But does it stop here with our intentions to measure the density of empty space? Is there any indirect clue to its density? Well, we KNOW that mass has inertia in totally empty space (ES) and that this follows the relation: F = m * a here on earth. This is due to the "friction" of the molecules in matter against an in empty space contained ES-quark grid. As both empty space as well as molecules of solid matter are basically constituted of the same material but of different density, shape and internal movement they will tend to somewhat stick together. I will later show that the same mass will need the double force to yield the same acceleration if you increase the ES density by eight times (e.g. from about 1 mg/ km^3 to 8 mg/ km^3 ) and in such an locally 8 times compressed empty space, the exact same mass "m" will be ruled by the universal law at this local position: F = m * a / 2
This linear relation of the impact of empty space density on mass inertia within the actual empty space only applies as long as the density difference between them is great. Compare to molecular gas behaviour at low pressures when its molecules mainly impact the wall of the vessel containing them instead of the molecules mainly impacting on each other or as when a gas is near its liquefaction. Linearity only applies within the near ideal regions of the mean free path length between gas molecule impacts and far from condensation.

I discuss these features of empty space here merely as an explanation to why I have found it better to change the title of this paper from "Empty Space Physics" to "On the origin of the laws in Physics". Because, the more I explored the properties of empty space it finally got more and more clear that ES is what governs the exact relations of all the laws in physics of everything that is within that amount of empty space!!! It is very simple logic actually: Aerodynamics depend on the properties of the air in which you fly, in fluid dynamics the viscosity and density of the used fluid governs the boat speed and power consumption and so on.

Shortly I will tell why I have not wanted to publish my findings before? It is very simple: I did not want to fall in the same pit as Albert Einstein, having no clear explanation to quantum physics !

As I sat on my veranda two years ago solving some SUDOKU puzzles I got a flash in my head heureka …. this is it!!! WOW…
What ???

Well, Albert Einstein was totally right as usual: "God really does not play with dices at all!". He actually continuously solves a 3 dimensional Samurai SUDOKU as big as the whole universe where each 9x9x9 grid has the approximate size of an electron !!! What's the difference then between throwing dices and solving sudoku??


Playing with dices has a purely random result (theoretically). Solving Sudoku has an exact final solution that is one and only one! This is because this is the basic inherent law of all SUDOKU-solving.


It does not matter if the total universe grid is only partly solved as long as the density of ES-quarks is big enough to have a single solution across the total grid i.e long enough time has elapsed since the "Big Bang" for the concentration of the 9 different ES quark types to be approximately equalised by means of the first fundamental law in universe: The law of mass action - I'm no astronomer or astrophysicist so I don't know if it's a few mS or millions of years after the "Big Bang". (Please tell me, I'm truly interested in when "God" started his solving! This is the point in time of the birth of consistent physical laws in universe! ) If you intentionally distract the partly or wholly solved grid by will and force, i.e. you switch the position of two nearby different ES-quarks then this in turn will force a new solution that will more or less instantly be corrected to the new solution by "The law of mass action" (Gods force) and will propagate throughout the total grid or in some special cases cause an almost instant response (much greater than light speed) at some distant point to yield the proper reaction leading to a final correct solution throughout the whole of the total in universes Samurai SUDOKU grid.


I already 30 year ago knew in detail that the nonlinear rotational energy of the unsymmetrical Big Bang was enclosed in small toroidally shaped rotating particles of slightly more dense empty space.
These hollow rings rotate both radially and circularly, held together by gravity. They may have an inherent unlinear circular rotation of itself around its periphery similar to "The Probe" and there are 9
basical different types based on the properties they get from the type of combination of linear/nonlinear rotation. This is possible because empty space is compressible (With the right tools!).
As with the SUDOKU solutions that are governed by pure mathematics the 9 different type of ES quarks are the only possible final stable states of Probe movement toroids if no outer force is applied.

It suddenly became clear to me that if all these 9 different randomly shattered ES quarks throughout the space looked in detail like a gigantic unsolved Samurai Sudoku in three dimensions, where each position in the 3x3x3 cubes only had a few ES quarks, then the "law of mass action" would tend to force the different nine ES quarks into the best nearest possible Sudoku solution merely by the random action of the law of mass action just because a true SAMURAI solution is the same as that concentration of all 9 different ES quarks gets totally the same throughout all of space. There are although still lots of different sudoku solution possible within one 9x9x9 sudoku cube. (But there is only one and only one solution for a specific SUDOKU puzzle!)
Having this in mind and practically testing what different forced distraction in the grid lead to "jumps" between nearby sudoku solution states (two or more ES quarks switching positions) all of the quantum properties of EM radiation as well as how faster than light speed communication is possible can be explained i.e. quantum physical behaviour in empty space can be fully explained. This is also the strongest proof that all of my theory is actually true. As these matters of quantum physics are well known to be true and thoroughly experimentally proven.

As I do not need to trip and fall in the quantum pit and also may honour Einsteins non Dice statement I feel now totally safe and confident in that this theory does not exclude any part of now known basic physic phenomena and is consistent with all known up to date physic laws.



Overview

You may have in thought that Mathematics really got truly operational with the introduction of the number Zero (0). Even if it itself seems to be of no value at all!

So what This site really wants to do, is to introduce Empty Space (ES) as an equally full member of the Physics laws in the same way. Physics is shown to be the origin of natures own actions and reactions between the ES and all that is within it.

I will try to show how the origin of all the different seemingly contra dictionary strange laws in Physics have very simple and logic explanations that simply come out of the true structure and properties of ES.

Hereby I also make clear that the following laws described in many parts herein are not restricted to the physic properties as described here on earth (SI system) but are shown to depend upon a small set of local physic properties of the local ES as the Local ES Density and its Inherent Differential Rotational Energy. These are remnants originating from the total weight and rotation before the scattering forced by the "big bang" and are usually called dark matter vs dark energy. They are formed as 9 different small toroidal shaped rings "ES quarks" whereon the remnants of the differential impulse of the "big bang" is absorbed in partially un-linear rotation. (Hint: mg/km^3)

Later I will show how the origin of quantum physics will have its detailed explanation depending on that ES is vastly filled with 9 different ES quarks in a three-dimensional SUDOKU matrix. This also explains how and why light has a limited speed but how and why information can travel almost instantly depending on that positional switches within quadruples of ES quarks in this gigantic matrix forces an instant reflecting change at the distance.

The pictures on this site are sometimes most for a decorative purpose. Just something to rest your eyes upon when not reading.

This site began publishing on the 100 year anniversary of Einsteins Theory of Relativity that also happens to be my 60th birthday.
Any technology mainly based on techniques or the theories described in here cannot be patented but is public domain.

www.EmptySpace.xyz