Introduction
Is any of what is outlined in my overview possible to achieve with simple means?
Researchers in physics have struggled to make a grand unified theorem of all forces in physics. Even Einstein didn't believe in quantum physics being a true part of the "real world". He who really had forced mindbreaking new laws to take a place in the physics library. Contemporary researchers have great problems in finding good explanations to astrophysical phenomena they call dark matter and dark energy.
Why do the laws of physics seam so different in macrocosmos and microcosmos?
You sometimes may get to wonder if they both can exist in the same place or even in the same universe at the same time. But all experimental evidence clearly proof that this actually is so and we will have to live with how things really are whatever we wish they should be.
Through our mathematical skills to analyze experimental relationships originally coming from well constructed physical research setups we may sometimes unveil structures and laws in nature that by no mean are obvious.
Hereby I must mention that the original hint that leads to a successful unveiling often comes from surprising not expected phenomena or by pure luck. This is because of the inherent nature of research - you really don't have to search for something if you already know the outcome of your research. (If you did already know the outcome all your research is wasted time and only a double check!)
I mention this because this is also the case with my results here. I "stumbled upon" almost the opposite what I was looking for.
Any way, if you want to succeed in finding a "grand theorem" that works in both microcosmos and macrocosmos you must carefully choose the fundamental physical quantities you use as base for your analysis. They should be stable and unchanged throughout a wide range between microcosmos and macrocosmos.
A set of origin could be: inertia, mechanical force and ES. Namely Newtonian physics or if applied at extreme speeds relativistic physics. If you are lucky and stumble upon the "right" experiment to analyze you might even get a hint on what causes the strange behavior called quantum physics in microcosmos or the origin of phenomena called dark matter and dark energy in macrocosmos... and at last unveil the nanocosmic structure that causes both these phenomena.
But to reach this point you must never forget the importance of that a stable ES will simultaneously exist at the same time in microcosmos and (not or) macrocosmos. The magnification of your telescope or microscope doesn't in any way change any point of ES if you look at the same immobile point. Magnification changes what you see of course but never what actually is there to see.
This is why a telescope vs a microscope can unveil different aspects within a part of space - but the contents within that space remain the same. In the same way different scientific instruments unveil different aspects within a portion of space.
Because the whole topic here is to unveil important characteristics of ES like inertia, rotational energy, density it cannot be to much underlined the importance of keeping your focus at the behavior of the ES in our experiments and that even more than the objects contained in it. If you want to use the number zero correct in mathematics you must use it with the same accuracy and correctness as the other numbers (1-9) otherwise you will quickly end in a total mess!
If you put two zeroes after $100 (= $10000) even someone from Wall Street with no knowledge in physics at all can tell you it makes at whole lot of a difference. Additional zeroes here are almost equally important as additional ones! ($10011)
With this I mean it is equally important if you add an extra portion of ES to the same place in space as the zeros above. The result is dramatically altered physical properties of the physical laws governing within that same place. My point is: you cannot handle ES as if it is nothing! Any correct calculus in physics must take into account the local inherent properties of the ES at the place of the experiment.
With this I mean it is equally important if you add an extra portion of ES to the same place in space as with the zeros above. The result of this is largely altered physical properties of the governing physical laws within that altered place. My point is: you cannot handle ES as if it is nothing! Any correct calculus in physics must take into account the local inherent properties of the ES at the place of the experiment. (Hint: double portion would be 2x ES inertia/dark matter and 2x ES rotation/dark energy within the same visual volume of empty space than there where before)
Hereby you must take into account that almost every physical phenomena - even those that seemingly do not incorporate any visually obvious reaction at all with the ES at its place of showing, actually often really is intimately dependent of mutual exchange of energy, mass and forces with ES. In this way ES works as a catalyst in a chemical reaction and part of it is absorbed, deformed and finally dropped again in its initial form.